microsoft, the software giant, has bought github, the code management repository, for $7.5 billion. because it is a quantity, $7.5 billion is pronounced seven point five billion dollars.
paul v. weinstein has an article in the harvard business review with this headline
Why Microsoft Is Willing to Pay So Much for GitHub
and the article breaks it down (explains it) like this:
[microsoft] is paying for the access it gets to the legions of developers who use github’s code repository products on a daily basis (the company’s strategic value) — so they can be guided into the microsoft developer environment, where the real money is made.
willing means microsoft is ok with it. a daily basis means every day. is made is passive voice. it’s redundant to say that microsoft makes money in microsoft developer environments, so passive voice is a better alternative.
practice english on a daily basis at richyrocks.com
but it has been reported around the internet that the move hasn’t sat well with (it’s annoyed) various coders who have been at odds (disagreed) philosophically with microsoft for a long time.
the nfl pregame protests didn’t sit well with president trump (epa/john g mabanglo; ap photo/brynn anderson)
cali haan explains on crowdfundinsider.com that
git, the social system used to collaborate on open source software projects at github, was invented by linux founder, linus torvalds.
mircosoft’s acqusition of github adds insult to injury (makes it worse) becuase
software developers and other computing aficionados have long resented microsoft for competitive attacks it made against linux in the early 2000s when freely-distributed linux software began to threaten microsoft market share.
inventors/creators are a commonly referred to with passive voice–invented by is an example in haan’s article. aficionado, like it is in spanish, is an enthusiast, a fan. resent is like feel offended by. threaten is put at risk. market share is the portion of the software market that microsoft controlled.
linux founder linus torvalds
how did linux succeed against microsoft?
torvalds cites the non-proprietary approach at linux as the reason its software systems have quietly become the most pervasive on the planet. linux software animates everything from android phones to the world’s top supercomputers.
cite is name, mention. non-proprietary means no licenses are necessary to use linux. approach is a style, technique. pervasive is ubiquitous, everywhere.
linux’s non-proprietary approach has made its systems the most pervasive in the world.
in other words, for years microsoft’s business model has been at odds with torvalds’ philosophy. in 2005, torvalds observed that
in the long run, you can’t sanely compete with the open-source mentality.
in the long run means an extended view of the future. sanely is rationally, realistically. open-source is software that is available for free and can be modified and redistributed.
20th century economist john maynard keynes may not have actually said yolo, but his quote “in the long run we’re all dead” is a similar idea.
acknowledges that there are small pockets of deep mistrust of microsoft in the open source community.
the bottom line: this is pretty good news for the world of open source and we should celebrate microsoft’s smart move…i will own responsibility for some of that [mistrust] as i spent a good part of my career at the linux foundation poking fun at microsoft…but times have changed and it’s time to recognize that we have all grown up.
acknowledge and own both mean accept. pocket in this context means isolated group. mistrust is the opposite of trust. the bottom line is the most important point. pretty is to a slight or significant degree. poke fun at is make fun of, mock. grow up means mature.
deadpool pokes fun at the superhero genre that it is also a part of.
and paul ford‘s article on bloomberg.com offers more analysis of the purchase. the headline reads
GitHub Is Microsoft’s $7.5 Billion Undo Button
the phrase $7.5 billion undo button is pronounced seven point five billion dollar undo button because the money phrase is an adjective describing undo button. undo button is a metaphor to say that microsoft has a chance to start over with open source developers.
an undo button
ford talks about the public’s unfamiliarity with github
it can be baffling what in god’s name github inc. does or why it’s worth so much…it was a service made by developers to meet the needs of other developers….they took something very weird and made it more usable.
wtf does github do? i’m fucking baffled.
and bloomberg’s conclusion is
north korean supreme leader kim jong un might have uttered this personal reflection to himself before his summit with u.s. president trump in singapore earlier this week.
are u a coder? do u use github? will microsoft screw up github? share your predictions under leave a reply
have fun, amigos.